FILM
- AS A -
SUBVERSIVE ART



L'OPERA MOUFFE
(Agnes Varda, France, 1958)  (F)
Two nude lovers experience sweet and smiling
pleasure in each other's bodies. From a haunting,
impressionist film poem by the well-known
French director. The lines of the two bodies
seem visually to fuse in fulfilled love.


THE END OF SEXUAL TABOOS:
  EROTIC AND PORNOGRAPHIC
CINEMA - PART TWO


FILMS
___________________________________________________________________________________________

LAST TANGO IN PARIS
(Bernardo Bertolucci, France/Italy, 1972)  (F)
After years of disregard, the international fame so suddenly
bestowed upon Bertolucci for having created a "breakthrough"
film all but obscures the question of just what this "breakthrough"
is meant to be; for neither stylistically, thematically nor in terms
of erotic tension does it go beyond Before the Revolution, his  best
work. In fact, the youthful excesses andvisual lyricism of this earlier
work seem preferable to the more conventional and subdued style
of Tango; and the intellectual weight and ideological subtlely of
Revolution are far more substantial than the puzzling "message"
of Tango.  As for Tango's sex scenes -- its  most brilliant aspect --
their explicitness neither goes as far as hardcore pornography
nor, if this comparison be considered fair, beyond I Am Curious -
Yellow / Blue, the real pioneer of liberated cinema sex. 
SC

This earlier work contained, just as Tango does, explicit
simulated copulation, sexual violence and near-rape;
it also featured, as Tango does not, frontal male nudity
and joyful erotic tension quite different from the sado-
masochist violence of Bertolucci's film.  The "break-
through", then, is in the production and distribution of
such a film by a major Hollywood company, United Artists.

The film's stark erotic realism is powerful, but not unique.
Extensive verbal "obscenity" (fully anticipated in Joseph Strick's
Tropic of Cancer, 1970) and an absence of sentimentality or
titillation are welcome aspects. But even if one entirely discounts
the hardcore films now available at least in certain countries,
only those who did not see Curious will be shocked by coital
movements, "unusual" positions, orgasmic sounds. And in
carefully avoiding certain images, such as male frontal nudity,
Bertolucci raises uncomfortable questions; for in Revolution,
his unfettered artistic passion never allowed calculated
avoidance of anything crucial; and penises are crucial to
a film pivoting on sex, particularly as full female frontal
nudity makes its appearance.  Equally disturbing are
unannounced post-premiere cuts involving an ironic
revelation of what today is considered commercially
inadvisable in America; not sex, but blasphemy.

Significantly, the only kind of sex missing in Curious is
represented in Tango by the tragic moment when the girl,
in order to get rid of him, masturbates Brando,; but then
at least the men in Curious had penises.   Still more sympto-
matic, what is possibly the most "shocking" image in the film
may be the bar of butter Brando reaches for in preparation
for anal intercourse; it derives its shock quality solely
from its association with the sex act that follows.

It is ironic, but not without precedent, that Bertolucci, from the
beginning a superlative, original talent who until recently could
find neither financing nor distribution, should gain instantaneous
international fame with what is essentially a work of transition
towards either large commercial success or artistic maturity.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

ECHOES OF SILENCE
(Peter Emanuel Goldman, USA, 1965)  (F)
Desperate sexuality, desperate emotions;
every gesture and inflection an act of grave
import; a film of young adults, infused with
a new existentialist humanism, devoid of
certainty or illusion.  The sharp contrast
and graniness of the still indicate the film's
distance from slick commercial cinema.
A major new talent.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

HISTORY OF THE BLUE MOVIE
(Alex de Renzie, USA, 1971)  (F)
Perhaps the most startling this about this film -- prototype of a genre --
is its legal and widespread presentation to packed student audiences
at American colleges.  An excellent compilation of old and new hardcore
"stag" films (with an intelligent narration stressing historical aspects),
its production was probably inevitable the moment it was realized that
no one held a copyright of these illegal, anonymous works.  Here we see
one of the earliest stag films, the 1915 A Free Ride; an unexpected item,
or it somehow still remains surprising to see our forefathers (now dead)
actually engaged in the same activities as we are.  There are also interesting
divergences from the later, more standardized stag films:  here both male
and female urinate, for laughs, on camera; during sex, the man only drops
his pants, looking very real, very ludicrous in his passionate entanglement;
and the girls seem literally exhausted at the end.  There are other classics
in this anthology:  the notorious Smart Aleck,  in which the then unknown
Candy Barr introduces unintended "cinema verite" into a porno film by
angrily refusing to perform fellatio, only later passionately to "insert" herself
into an oral sex act between her partner and another girl; and the equally
famous The None Story, whose star, at beginning and end, appears in a nun's
attire (these sequences omitted from a later version retitled "College Co-Ed".)
A 3rd notable episode shows a nude model discussing her sexual preferences with
an unseen interviewer in sensitive, arousing detail, the camera focusing mostly
on her face in an example of verbal eroticism reminiscent of Godard's Weekend.
As her talk turns more passionate and fantasy-ridden, she becomes involved in
on-screen masturbation; and both she and the interviewer fall silent until her
climax.  The film ends with an erotic 1970 sequence, in which a young couple
go to De Renzie's studio to act in one of his films and then see themselves on
the  screen in a highly charged, professionally directed sex episode which
(delightfully) includes laughter, hugs, and warmth; a portent of things to
come when serious  filmmakers, free of censorship or contempt for the genre,
supplant the mechanical pornographers by introducing erotic realism. 
SC

___________________________________________________________________________________________

I AM CURIOUS - YELLOW / BLUE
(JAG AR NYFIKEN - GUL / BLA)
(Vilgot Sjoman, Sweden, 1967)  (F)
A cluttered room, a hastily made floor bed, an eager
young couple:  a scene from the legendary work
that opened commercial cinema to eroticism and
pornography.  Sex is demystified, desentimentalized,
shown as a part of life.  Coital activity is frequently
and directly shown; but there are no erections not
penetrations, as there are in today's hardcore films. 
SC
______________________________________________

The historical task of the leadership, said Rosa Luxemburg, is to make
itself unnecessary. This is precisely what happened to this legendary,
much-maligned work; prime catalyst of the new "permissive" cinema,
it was quickly superseded by works that went further though not
necessarily deeper.  In retrospect, its primary virtue lies in its
erotic realism.  Perhaps no other film before it was as direct in
presuming that everybody does it, knows about it, enjoys it; does
it at times with laughter, or imperfectly, tenderly, or in rage, and
that it is silly to exclude so human and beloved an enterprise from
the screen.  Thus we see sex done on a hastily cleared floor (though
the bra at first will not unhook), in a lake (with a long-shot of heaving
buttocks periodically emerging from the water), in a tree (a messy,
giggly affair), from behind (in anger and lust), and while straddling
the balustrade of the Royal Palace in Stockholm, with a guard in
attention, sweating to keep his composure amidst dropping panties
and voluptuous movements.  The lovemaking throughout is neither
titillating, mechanical, bourgeois nor "deeply significant"; but casual and
free, filled with warmth, strife, and experimentation.  He is her "Number 30"
or so and there will be others (including Sjoman, the film's director who
periodically enters the action, and intentionally blurs reality and illusion).

The portrayal of sex goes further than ever before. There is no
mistaking the spread legs, the man between them, the movements,
the outspoken  dialogue. Yet, while sex organs are sometimes shown
and even (somewhat) manipulated, we see no erection nor penetration.

But the sex scenes (at least on first viewing) overshadow the film's
main theme:  the attack on the values (or lack of values) of the
Swedish welfare state and contemporary society in general.
Alienation, cynicism, and boredom seem to characterize the
people appearing in its many political discussions and interviews.
 The young heroine both investigates and symbolizes the social and
sexual mores of an  affluent and fatigued welfare state, fearful of
revealing itself as a class society.  The sexual episodes are used
as counterpoint to the alienation she feels towards her society and
appear as attempts (however superficial) at human  reaffirmation;
they are essential components of an ideological statement.

The final subversion of the work is in its form. Sjoman, as other c
contemporary filmmakers, aims at immediacy and veracity by
constantly breaking down the boundaries between fiction and
reality (even to the extent of appearing within the film as its
director, commenting on its action, and having the actress conduct
real interviews with real passers-by).  The spectator is thus confron-
ted with the need to redefine the concept of reality in his own life.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

THE CONFORMIST
(Bernardo Bertolucci, Italy/France/West Germany, 1970)  (F)
The subtlety of composition, decor, and
atmosphere within a single shot denotes
the presence of a master.  The time is the 30s,
revealed in dress, wallpaper, style of couch.
The slanting rays of the sun add to the
pent-up erotic tension of a moment soon
to erupt in a sexual encounter on the floor. 
SC

___________________________________________________________________________________________

KODAK LOVE POEMS
(Andre Noren, USA, 1970)  (F)
Excellent example of the autobiographical, "diary" type of
personal cinema,  this is an intense evocation, in rapid flash
frames, of erotic episodes and memories.  There is no continuity
except that of sex; nothing is withheld.  Pans, rapid cuts, zooms,
and  superimpositions further "complicate" these free-flowing
memory traces, following no ordered or preconceived patterns.
Cats, apartment interiors, passing pedestrians, a storm, mingle
with the many and mysterious occupations of human love,
shown head-on, in snatches; a record of acts and feelings on film.
 Unlike commercial pornography, the intention here is revelatory
and personal; only censors will fail to notice the difference.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

BELLE DE JOUR
(Luis Bunuel, France, 1966)
What a master can show by showing almost nothing.
The man's aggressive intention is clearly implied,
as is the woman's "resistance" (her legs still closed,
though lying quietly).  She seems well-dressed,
he has a hole in his sock.  Compositional lines,
though strongly geometric and at ninety degree
angles, are tilted, increasing the shot's dynamism.
As usual, Bunuel seems preoccupied with feet. 
SC

___________________________________________________________________________________________

ORANGE
(Karen Johnson, USA, 1969)
Quite appropriately a prizewinner at the
1970 International Erotic Film Festival,
this closeup of the peeling, sectioning,
licking, and eating of a navel orange becomes
a sensuous, sexual experience that disturbs
and attracts by the ambivalence of its images;
erotic associations constantly impinge.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

QUIET DAYS IN CLICHY
(Jens Jorgen Thorsten, Denmark, 1970)
Henry Miller's memoir of friends, women, and cheap
wine is a relaxed, very sexy outrage that manages
to be both humorous and pornographic.  Genitals and
"penetration" are shown and a particularly anti-bourgeois
scene has the starving Miller flavor a cookie from a
garbagecan with odor derived from his anus. 
SC

___________________________________________________________________________________________

PSYCHOMONTAGE
(Eberhard and Phyllis Kronhausen, USA, 1960?)
Sexologists, psychologists, and proponents
 of sexual freedom, the Kronhausens here
attempt to induce erotic response in
the audience by carefully chosen visual
stimuli and juxtapositions (aimed at both
conscious and unconscious).  Phallic symbols
and open orifices, a tongue licking an orange,
an unexpected finger entering the frame:
almost any object or act, no matter how
innocuous, the Kronhausens show, can be
made to appear erotic, and reveals our
predisposition towards "shaping" visual
evidence for purposes of erotic gratification.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

SCHOOLGIRL
(David Reberg, USA, 1971)  (F)
American "hardcore" productions turns on the "research" done
by a California college girl for her paper on  "sexual sub-cultures".
 Answering kinky ads in the underground press, she meets a couple
for a menage a trois (and while performing fellatio on the husband,
is asked by the wife to "move her hair out of her face" so that she
can watch better.  She then lets herself be told by a man on the other
end of a phone how to masturbate and to describe it  to him at the
same time; we see him masturbate as well, until both  simultaneously
come "by telephone".  Several adventures later, she finally delivers
her paper:  "Their sex life is awful and alienated ... I never parti-
cipated but only observed from an academic viewpoint."  More
than most, this film approaches erotic realism; despite its blatant
commercialism it shows red pimples on buttocks, scratches on legs,
penises that fall out amidst gales of laughter, chirping birds, eja-
culations into a girl's mouth on-camera.  The protagonists are "doing
their thing" without hesitation. Significantly, the two constants are the
telephone (dangerous tool of a technological age)  that here spins a web
of corruption; and fellation, with which every sex act in the film begins.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

SECRETS OF LIFE
(Victor Faccinto, USA, 1971)
Quite properly, unsympathetic critics refer to this as
a "filthy" cartoon.  Using intentionally naive cut-out
figures and a crude, slashing style of graphics and
action, this is a sophisticated, garish work of
pop art.   A driving tempo propells the viewer
through images of violence and pornographic
sex.  The underlying pain is unmistakable.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

SEX
(David Avidan, Israel, 1971)
The image is universal; the country of origin is Israel,
confirming that its young are not different from
others elsewhere.  The atmosphere is cool, modern,
Western; the decor ulitarian, the style avant-garde.
Nothing detracts from the soft abandon of the scene.
This film is banned in Israel.
______________________________________________

And who said that Israel cannot make sex films?
Yet the contrasting myths of Israel as an idealistic
society given to righteous self-improvement or a
militarist-orthodox state bent on self-aggrandize-
ment are so strong that this work comes as a surprise.
Its manifold copulations, sophisticated stance, avant-
garde modernity, and political thrusts stamp it as
the testimony of a new generation.  One sequence:
"A vision of the Virgin Mary waiting for the Holy Ghost
to do his thing, as Avidan's voice sings a tearful Yiddish
refrain and Joseph the Carpenter bangs on the door,
before going to take his vengeance by building a cross."

___________________________________________________________________________________________

ROOM SERVICE 75
(Fred Baker, USA, 1971)
The modern "hardcore" film -- though light years
ahead of the commercial cinema in terms of sex --
does not consist of an unbroken series of coupling
organs; elements of subtlety and aesthetics are
beginning to invade it.  The rug, the very anonymity
of the performers, the camera angle, and profes-
sional photography indicate that art is not far away.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

SHADOW OF AN APPLE
(Robert Lapoujade, France, 1965?)
We owe the eminent French painter -- turned
filmmaker -- this most lyrical and poetic portrayal
of sex yet attempted in animated cinema.  Based
on the story of Leda and the swan, the constant
transmogrifications of subtle, erotic images
project an atmosphere of desperate, elemental,
endless sex that is both liberating and disturbing.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

KAMA SUTRA RIDES AGAIN
(Bob Godfrey, Great Britain, 1971)
Certain structural difficulties seem implicit in this
new sex position (one of many), propounded
in a tongue-in-cheek sex manual by one of
the most talented international animators.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

TALES
(Cassandra Gerstein, USA, 1970)  (F)
A curious, controversial film (produced
by an all-woman crew), consisting entirely of
"tales" of sexual adventures (or fantasies) told
by a group of youngish New Yorkers gathered
in an apartment.  One story prompts the next;
the atmosphere is informal; the result -- a
censorable, liberating example of verbal
eroticism, quite shocking in its impact.
It is the very absence of descriptive image
and the ability secretly to observe "real"
people freely recalling erotic experiences,
that accounts for the film's effect:  but the
eroticism unquestionably also flows --
non-verbally -- from the faces, hesitations,
and gestures of the individual participants.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

PANDORA'S BOX
(G.W. Pabst, Germany, 1928)  (F)
Louise Brooks, one of the most erotic actresses of
world cinema in one of her most erotic roles. Her
sullen, volatile sexuality is reinforced by the deep,
expressionist shadows on face and neck as against
the provocative lighting of her body.  The entire
frame area is crowded in tight compositional design,
reflecting the erotic tension which this confrontation
of (anonymous) male and arousing female exudes.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

A STRANGER KNOCKS
(Johan Jacobsen, Denmark, 1963)  (F)
A censorship landmark case:  the entire plot pivots on an
act of intercourse, during which the woman accidentally
discovers the vital clue to the film's mystery. The complete
absence of nudity and total revelance of the scene to the
plot posed an impossible problem  for the American
censors, and led, upon appeals  against its prohibition,
to the abolition of the Supreme Court of the entire system
of American state censorship in 1967. This development
contributed  significantly to the later era of sexual
permissiveness in the American cinema.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

PICKPOCKET
(Robert Bresson, France, 1958)
The erotic intensity of the act of stealing has never
been more poignantly revealed than in this film;
the poetic montages, outlining techniques of theft
in wordless, fluid succession, are memorable
visual triumphs.  As usual, Bresson's extreme
visual economy and directness hides a hallucina-
tory reality; the sexual implications of forcibly
removing another person's "valuables" by close --
yet, significantly, only symbolic -- contact with him.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

TAKE ME
(Stephen Dwoskin, Great Britain, 1969)
For thirty minutes, a girl attempts
to seduce the viewer (the camera)
by provocative movements and kisses,
becoming progressively more covered
with paint until the seduction "succeeds".
An intense, sadly masturbatory tour de force
by England's most iconoclastic independent.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND
(Jean-Luc Godard, France, 1968)
Verbal pornography as art -- by Godard.
The woman, her face deeply shadowed,
recounts very specific sexual memories
while the male (analyst?) listens impas-
sively. There is little movement or action;
yet the sequence is drenched in eroticism,
to which the girl's pose and attire (and
the presence of a male) contribute. 
SC

___________________________________________________________________________________________

WHAT GOES ON AT SEX THERAPY CLINICS
(Community Medical Cablecasting, USA, 1972)
An example of the twilight status presently enjoyed by
American cable television: not yet large enough to be a
"threat" to law and order, yet sufficiently widespread to be
seen by considerable audiences.   On the same television set
on which the commercial networks impose the most onerous
censorship of visual materials.  Community Medical Cablecasting
presents films for doctors which, however, are available to all
cable-TV subscribers. The film under discussion presents a
middle-aged, middle-class couple, comfortably ensconced in
a bourgeois doctor's office, listening to two smiling sexologists
outline a carefully graduated program to correct the man's
premature ejaculation; the wife is to masturbate him three times
a night until immediately prior to ejaculation and then to stop;
only the fourth time should she bring him to climax.  Moans and
groans are encouraged.  Erection and penetration are freely dis-
cussed and an air of smiling gentility and earnest rationalism never
disappears from proceedings unprecedented for American television.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

SHE DONE HIM WRONG
(Lowell Sherman, USA, 1933)  (F)
Sex Then:  this shot was once considered daring.
It touches upon the act and skirts it; titillation
is rampant.  The male appears as agressor, but
the female (note calculating glance) has helped
induce her sweet predicament.  The sexes are
apart, wear masks, and are submerged by heavily
"erotic" decor; they are clearly defined as actors.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

UNFOLDING
(Constance Beeson, USA, 1969)
Sex Now:  The masks are off, as are the clothes;
these are people, not actors; titillation is gone
and lust is accompanied by warmth and tender-
ness. Two pairs of hands create a circle.  This
lyrical  work -- significantly, one of the few erotic
films  ever made by women -- progresses from
foreplay to explicit sex, proving that even
"hardcore" sequences can be subverted into
 dealing with feelings rather than mechanics.